Case 4102659/2018 · Employment Tribunal
io v Represented by: Mr D Murray Consultant Miss M Degnan Elizabeth Girvan t/a Merkland Private Nursery — 2018
- Case reference
- 4102659/2018
- Decision date
- 9 May 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mary Kearns
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for the respondent as a nursery nurse from 30 January 2017 until her summary dismissal on 26 November 2017. She told the respondent at lunchtime on 24 November 2017 that she was pregnant, was then told to go home, and later received a letter dated 24 November 2017 saying there had been complaints from parents about her conduct and that her employment was terminated with effect from that date. The tribunal found that no complaints had previously been notified to her.
On the evidence it accepted, the tribunal found that the dismissal on 26 November 2017 was unfavourable treatment because of pregnancy and occurred within the protected period, contrary to section 18 Equality Act 2010. The claim therefore succeeded.
For remedy, the tribunal found that if she had not been dismissed the claimant would have remained in work until mid-June 2018 and would then have been entitled to statutory maternity pay. It assessed her financial loss at £12,472.94, comprising wages from 27 November 2017 to 11 June 2018, together with maternity pay that would have followed. It also found she lost her tenancy as a result of the dismissal and had to borrow £2,175 to furnish replacement accommodation.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence and a GP report that the dismissal caused increased anxiety and had a significant impact on her normal functioning. Taking that evidence into account, it assessed injury to feelings at £5,000, described as toward the higher end of the lower Vento band. The total compensation was calculated at £19,648.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal found the claimant's dismissal on 26 November 2017 was unfavourable treatment because of pregnancy, contrary to section 18 Equality Act 2010. The judgment records that the claim form also mentioned notice pay, but the reasons and award are addressed only on the pregnancy discrimination claim. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £19,648 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,648
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £14,648
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 18 Equality Act 2010
- Vento band
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.