Case 4102676/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S McNamee v Luddon Construction — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102676/2015
- Decision date
- 15 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S McNamee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal recorded that on 12 November 2020 the claimant was given an opportunity to provide written reasons by 26 November 2020, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing categories identify Unlawful Deduction from Wages and Working Time Regulations, but the judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing categories identify Unlawful Deduction from Wages and Working Time Regulations, but the judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.