Case 4102679/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Belle v Sophie Amono — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102679/2020
- Decision date
- 24 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J McCluskey
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Belle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims against Ms Sophie Amono for unfair dismissal after exercising or claiming a statutory right, breach of contract in relation to notice pay, unpaid wages, and holiday pay. During the continued hearing, the claimant withdrew the holiday pay claim and said any holiday entitlement had been paid.
The tribunal’s central issue was whether Ms Amono or Let’s Do Stuffs Limited was the claimant’s employer. After hearing evidence and considering the documents, the tribunal found that the claimant was employed by Let’s Do Stuffs Limited from 3 February 2020 until her employment ended on 12 April 2020. It accepted that the company traded under the name Stuffs, that the employment paperwork and emails were branded accordingly, that the claimant had a work email address ending @letsdostuffs.co.uk, and that the termination letter was headed Let’s Do Stuffs Limited.
The tribunal also relied on the claimant’s own email of 5 April 2020, in which she referred to herself as a contractual employee of Stuffs. It accepted Ms Amono’s evidence that the company did not yet have a business bank account when March wages were paid from her personal account, and it treated that as consistent with the company’s early trading position rather than with personal employment by Ms Amono.
Because Let’s Do Stuffs Limited was not a party to the proceedings, the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to decide the claimant’s unfair dismissal, notice pay, or wages claims against Ms Amono. Those claims were therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim for unfair dismissal after exercising or claiming a statutory right. Dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was employed by Let’s Do Stuffs Limited, not by Ms Amono, so it had no jurisdiction against the named respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction after the tribunal found the employer was Let’s Do Stuffs Limited rather than Ms Amono. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction after the tribunal found the claimant’s employer was Let’s Do Stuffs Limited, not Ms Amono. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but untaken holiday entitlement was withdrawn during the continued hearing, and the claimant confirmed any holiday entitlement had been paid. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.