Case 4102683/2018 · Employment Tribunal
D O’Dempsey Members: Ms J S Anderson Mr W Muir Mr M Ghani v Respondent — 2018
- Case reference
- 4102683/2018
- Decision date
- 3 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
- Venue
- Glasgow
- Panel members
- Ms J S Anderson, Mr W Muir, Mr M Ghani
Parties
1 namedClaimant
D O’Dempsey Members: Ms J S Anderson Mr W Muir Mr M Ghani
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Glasgow on 23 July 2018, Employment Judge D O'Dempsey sat with Ms J S Anderson, Mr W Muir and Mr M Ghani. The tribunal heard the respondent's application under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure for the claim to be dismissed because the claimant did not attend.
Having considered all the information available to it, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims. The extracted judgment does not contain any findings on the substantive merits of the race discrimination or unfair dismissal allegations, and it records no award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend; the extracted judgment does not record a merits determination. The race discrimination claim type is inferred from the case listing rather than the short judgment text. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend; the extracted judgment does not record a merits determination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.