Case 4102686/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Gegan v - solicitor D R Newitt Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102686/2020
- Decision date
- 14 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Cowen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Gegan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge S Cowen, sitting by CVP on 1-2 October 2020, recorded that Ms S Gegan's claim for unfair dismissal against DR Newitt Limited was upheld. The written judgment states that the reasons for that decision were given orally at the hearing on 2 October 2020, and it directs that the respondent's name be recorded as DR Newitt Limited.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £13,397.19 compensation. It also stated that the respondent would be liable to repay the DWP £1,366.35 in recoupment of benefits. No further written reasons, separate claim outcomes, or legal tests are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was upheld for reasons given orally at the hearing on 2 October 2020. It also records a compensation award of £13,397.19 and a separate DWP recoupment liability of £1,366.35. | Upheld | — | £13,397 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,397
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £13,397
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.