Case 4102693/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Merry Levenseat Ltd v Represented by: Mr C Robertson * Solicitor — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102693/2019
- Decision date
- 17 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Merry Levenseat Ltd
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a complaint of constructive unfair dismissal, described in the reasons as including ordinary unfair dismissal and automatically unfair dismissal on the grounds of public interest disclosure. The tribunal did not reach the merits. It first dealt with time bar and found that the ET1 was lodged on 26 February 2019, after the extended time limit had expired on 21 January 2019 following ACAS early conciliation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the ET1 was presented out of time, that it had been reasonably practicable for the claim to be lodged in time, and that the tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. The merits of the constructive unfair dismissal and public-interest-disclosure allegations were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.111(2) ERA 1996
- ACAS Early Conciliation stop-the-clock provisions
- not reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.