Case 4102693/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M McCafferty v Secure Transport Solutions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102693/2022
- Decision date
- 4 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murphy
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M McCafferty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs M McCafferty brought a claim against Secure Transport Solutions Limited for two weeks' lying time which she said had been promised for payment when her employment ended. She clarified at the hearing that she was not pursuing any notice period claim, only the outstanding lying time. The respondent did not enter an ET3, did not attend the hearing, and was not represented. The tribunal proceeded in the respondent's absence under Rule 47 after considering the available information and the steps taken to notify the respondent.
The tribunal found that the complaint was presented within three months of the payment of wages from which the deduction was made, namely 30 January 2022, and therefore was not time barred. It held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £711.54, being unpaid wages earned in the period 3 to 17 October 2020 and retained as lying time due to be paid in the claimant's final pay following termination of employment. The award was expressed gross of tax and national insurance.
The claimant's breach of contract claim was dismissed. The judgment records no separate monetary award for that claim and no separate findings beyond the claimant's clarification that her case was confined to the unpaid lying time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 ERA 1996 and ordered payment of £711.54 for unpaid wages earned in the period 3 to 17 October 2020 and retained as 'lying time' due in the claimant's final pay. | Upheld | — | £712 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant clarified during the hearing that she was not pursuing any notice period claim and that the claim was limited to outstanding lying time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £712
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.