Case 4102703/2019 · Employment Tribunal
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102703/2019 Mr L Bottari v P-Asta+Co Ltd Al Dente — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102703/2019
- Decision date
- 16 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona Maclean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102703/2019 Mr L Bottari
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented. On the available material, Employment Judge Shona Maclean determined that Mr L Bottari had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered P-Asta+Co Ltd Al Dente to pay damages of £744, calculated as three weeks' pay at £248 per week.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was therefore entitled to a redundancy payment. That award was fixed at £1,488, described in the judgment as six weeks' pay at £248 per week. The judgment further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,112, calculated by reference to 264 hours at £8 per hour.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for breach of contract in respect of notice, calculated as 3 weeks' pay at £248. | Upheld | — | £744 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of 6 weeks' pay at £248. | Upheld | — | £1,488 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £2,112, described as 264 hours at £8 per hour. | Upheld | — | £2,112 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,344
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.