Case 4102705/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Paul v Prancing Stage Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4102705/2023
- Decision date
- 2 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Paul
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Glasgow on 2 April 2024, Employment Judge M Robison gave an oral judgment with reasons in favour of Miss M Paul against Prancing Stage Limited. The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
The only monetary award recorded in the judgment was £19,281.47, described as compensation for unfair dismissal. The judgment does not separate that sum into basic award, compensatory award, or interest components.
No discrimination, whistleblowing, redundancy, wages, or breach of contract findings are recorded in the extracted judgment text, and no additional legal tests are named in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and ordered the respondent to pay £19,281.47 in compensation for unfair dismissal. The judgment does not split the award into separate heads. | Upheld | — | £19,281 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,281
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £19,281
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.