Case 4102728/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Simon v Manorview Hotels Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4102728/2024
- Decision date
- 23 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sutherland
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Simon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing in a disability discrimination case. The tribunal did not decide the substantive discrimination complaints. It decided only whether Mrs L Simon was a disabled person at the relevant time, which the parties agreed was June to September 2023. The claimant relied on fibromyalgia and perimenopause; she no longer relied on asthma. The tribunal accepted that fibromyalgia had been diagnosed in 2011 and that she had been diagnosed as perimenopausal in May 2021.
The tribunal found that both conditions were impairments within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. It accepted that fibromyalgia was a permanent condition causing body pain, fatigue and cognitive issues, with flare-ups a couple of times a year, and that perimenopause was a temporary condition lasting a number of years and causing similar symptoms together with low mood and anxiety. It found that, during flare-ups, the claimant had difficulty sleeping, walking, standing, sitting, concentrating, remembering information and making decisions, particularly at work, and that these activities were normal day-to-day activities.
Applying the disability definition, the tribunal held that the adverse effect was substantial because the claimant could walk only for limited periods, stand for limited periods, sit for limited periods, and had difficulty with concentration, memory and decision-making, sometimes requiring time off work. It also held that the effect was long term because the flare-ups had lasted and were likely to last or recur for at least 12 months. The tribunal concluded that the claimant was disabled at the relevant time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Open preliminary hearing only: the tribunal decided that the claimant was disabled at the relevant time under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. No substantive discrimination liability or remedy was determined in this judgment. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5 Equality Act 2010
- SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle 2009 UKHL 37
- EHRC Code of Practice on Employment (2015)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.