Case 4102734/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Bitta v AA Logistics Solutions Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102734/2023
- Decision date
- 4 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Bitta
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Bitta brought a claim complaining that AA Logistics Solutions Limited had failed to pay his outstanding wages and other contractual payments on termination. The respondent did not present a response and did not attend the remote hearing. The tribunal relied on the claimant's contract, messages and P45, and was satisfied it could make findings despite technical issues during the hearing.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed as a multidrop driver from 21 November 2022 until 6 December 2022 on a salary of £1,800 per month. It accepted that he had received no payment of wages or expenses on termination. On that basis, it calculated the wages due at termination as £946.85 gross and held that the respondent's failure to pay that sum amounted to an unlawful deduction from wages under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had paid £25 for a basic disclosure from Disclosure Scotland, which the respondent had confirmed would be reimbursed in his first wage. As that expense had not been repaid and remained outstanding on termination, the tribunal held that there was a breach of contract and ordered payment of £25. The total sum awarded was £971.85.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay wages due on termination and awarded the gross sum calculated for the period worked. | Upheld | — | £947 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent had not reimbursed £25 for the Disclosure Scotland expense, which the contract said would be repaid in the first wage and remained outstanding on termination. | Upheld | — | £25 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £972
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.23 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.