Case 4102741/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D O’Boyle v McCallum Food Limited t/a German Donner Kebab — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102741/2023
- Decision date
- 16 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Campbell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D O’Boyle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr D O’Boyle, had worked for McCallum Food Limited t/a German Donner Kebab from 10 March 2019 and was latterly a Prep Supervisor paid at £11.50 per hour. His line manager from around August 2022 was Mr Dale Glendinning. On 2 January 2023 the claimant was scheduled to work but did not attend, saying he felt unable to work after difficulties in his relationship had affected his emotional state. He did not notify Mr Glendinning before his shift. He returned to work on 3 January 2023 and was told by a chef, on Mr Glendinning’s instructions, to go home, that his shifts that week were covered, and that he would be asked to attend a meeting.
The tribunal accepted the claimant’s evidence that he was dismissed at a meeting on 9 January 2023. At that meeting he explained why he had been absent on 2 January and that he had returned to work the next day, but Mr Glendinning said he was going to terminate his employment. The respondent later sent an undated letter headed “Your verbal resignation”, but the tribunal preferred the claimant’s evidence and found that the respondent had not discharged the burden of showing that it dismissed him for a potentially fair reason under section 98(1) and (2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal said it was not clear whether the reason was capability, conduct, or some other substantial reason, and on that basis the dismissal was unfair.
In considering compensation, the tribunal said a fair process would have involved fair notice of the meeting, notice that dismissal might be decided, written reasons, and a right of appeal. None of those features were present. The basic award was calculated at £776.25 using two years’ service, an average of 22.5 hours per week, and the claimant’s hourly rate of £11.50. The compensatory award was calculated at £2,639.46: £1,800 for the period from 9 January to 5 March 2023 at £225 per week net, and £839.46 for 6 March to 16 April 2023 at £139.91 per week after Universal Credit, with the tribunal finding that he should have been able to secure sufficient work by 17 April 2023. The total award was £3,415.71.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,639 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,416
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £776
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,639
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 98(1) and (2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.