Case 4102751/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4102751/2019 Mr Tristan Aust v Richard Irvin & Sons Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102751/2019
- Decision date
- 8 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4102751/2019 Mr Tristan Aust
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. On the available material, Employment Judge L Wiseman found that Mr Tristan Aust was unfairly dismissed by Richard Irvin & Sons Limited.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of £7,637.55, stated to be calculated as 15 weeks at a gross weekly pay of £509.17. It also awarded a compensatory award of £1,257.11, made up of £241.11 for loss of earnings and £1,016 for loss of statutory employment rights.
The judgment was dated 5 August 2019 and entered in the register on 8 August 2019. The total award was £8,894.66.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £7,637.55 and a compensatory award of £1,257.11. | Upheld | — | £8,895 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,895
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,638
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,257
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.