Case 4102751/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. G Liebert v Edwards Engineering (Perth) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102751/2022
- Decision date
- 25 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. G Liebert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs G Liebert, was employed by Edwards Engineering (Perth) Ltd from 19 April 2021 to 2 May 2022 as a Quality, Health, Safety and Environmental Manager. Her written contract dated 12 March 2021 stated that she would be provided with an appropriate company vehicle, but it did not contain any express term saying that a car allowance would be paid if a vehicle was not immediately available. The tribunal found that the claimant used her own vehicle for site visits and that mileage was paid at £0.45 per mile under the respondent’s policy.
The tribunal rejected the claimant’s case that there was an implied contractual obligation to pay a car allowance for April to August 2021. It held that the written contract was clear, that the parties later negotiated separately about a car allowance in October and November 2021, and that this conduct was inconsistent with any argument that such a payment was already an implied term of the contract. On that basis, the claim for car allowance between April 2021 and August 2021 was dismissed.
The tribunal found that the parties did agree in around November 2021 that the claimant would be paid £250 net, equivalent to £493 gross per month, starting from September 2021 until the company vehicle arrived. It found that the claimant should have received £1,479 gross for September, October and November 2021, but the respondent’s November 2021 payment of £1,300 gross left a shortfall of £179 gross in respect of September 2021. That amount was awarded as damages for breach of contract, subject to deductions of tax and national insurance where applicable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Partly successful. The tribunal dismissed the alleged breach insofar as it concerned car allowance for April to August 2021, but held there was a shortfall of £179 gross in the agreed car allowance for September 2021 and awarded that sum as damages. | Other | — | £179 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £179
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £179
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994
- implied term/business efficacy
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.