Case 4102753/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Protool Engineering Supplies Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102753/2022
- Decision date
- 29 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade
- Venue
- Edinburgh via Cloud Video Platform
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a judgment by consent of parties. It amended the respondent's name to Protool Engineering Supplies Ltd and recorded the parties' agreement that the respondent would pay the claimant, Mr A Hardie, £1,012.50 in respect of his holiday pay claim for the period 1 January 2020 to 4 March 2022, described as 15 days outstanding holiday.
The order required payment by no later than 4pm on 4 August 2022 into the bank account held on record by the respondent. It also provided that tax and national insurance were to be deducted if required, provided the respondent notified the claimant in writing and remitted any deductions to HMRC. The judgment does not contain any merits findings beyond the consent order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal issued a judgment by consent of parties. The order records agreement that the respondent would pay the claimant £1,012.50 in respect of his holiday pay claim for 1 January 2020 to 4 March 2022, described as 15 days outstanding holiday. | Settled | — | £1,013 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,013
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.