Case 4102756/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102756/2022 Miss C MacCallum v Paul Mulvaney — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102756/2022
- Decision date
- 21 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge C McManus Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102756/2022 Miss C MacCallum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented. Employment Judge C McManus found that Miss C MacCallum had suffered an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent, Paul Mulvaney, to pay the gross sum of £1,732.94. The judgment also recorded that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and awarded gross damages of £799.82 for that breach.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £799.82. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £319.92 gross. The respondent was permitted to deduct income tax and employee National Insurance contributions, if required by law, provided the relevant sums were remitted to HMRC and evidence of the deductions was given to the claimant; payment of the balance would satisfy the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,733 |
| Breach of contract | Award made for notice pay after finding dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £800 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £800 |
| Holiday pay | Award made for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £320 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,653
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.