Case 4102766/2023 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102766/2023 (V) Held at Aberdeen on August 20235 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr A R Dunnachie v W & H Leslie (Aberdeen) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102766/2023
- Decision date
- 23 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102766/2023 (V) Held at Aberdeen on August 20235 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr A R Dunnachie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 14 August 2023, Employment Judge J M Hendry considered the claimant's claims against W & H Leslie (Aberdeen) Ltd. The judgment records that the claimant was unable to demonstrate that it was not reasonably practicable for the claims to be lodged on time, or within such other period as the tribunal considered reasonable.
On that basis, the tribunal found that it had no jurisdiction and dismissed the claims. The written judgment was dated 23 August 2023 and sent to the parties on the same date. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the claimant could not demonstrate that it was not reasonably practicable for the claims to be lodged in time or within any other period the tribunal considered reasonable. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the claimant could not demonstrate that it was not reasonably practicable for the claims to be lodged in time or within any other period the tribunal considered reasonable. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the claimant could not demonstrate that it was not reasonably practicable for the claims to be lodged in time or within any other period the tribunal considered reasonable. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- not reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.