Case 4102771/2016 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4102771/2016 & Others (see attached schedule) Mrs C Booth & Others (see attached schedule) v Represented by: Mr D Hutchison – Solicitor Aberdeenshire Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102771/2016
- Decision date
- 19 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4102771/2016 & Others (see attached schedule) Mrs C Booth & Others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a schedule of equal pay cases against Aberdeenshire Council covering several named claimants, including Carol F Booth, Simon J Collins, Fiona H Duthie, Catherine B Foster, Claire M Glancey and Gordon B Thompson. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the equal pay claims.
The tribunal stated that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No liability determination, comparator analysis, or remedy assessment is set out in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | Schedule of dismissals for equal pay cases against Aberdeenshire Council. The judgment records that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants and therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.