Case 4102776/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102776/2017 Mr E Olivarius v LK Foods Ltd st and 1 other — 2017
- Case reference
- 4102776/2017
- Decision date
- 2 November 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Susan Walker
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102776/2017 Mr E Olivarius
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claims. On that basis, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No merits findings or remedy award are set out in the judgment text. The order was issued by Employment Judge Susan Walker on 2 November 2017 and entered in the register the same day.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment text does not set out the individual heads of claim; this classification is based on the case listing categories. The tribunal recorded that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimant and were dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment text does not set out the individual heads of claim; this classification is based on the case listing categories. The tribunal recorded that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimant and were dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.