Case 4102780/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Docherty v Clydebank Hotels Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102780/2019
- Decision date
- 15 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Docherty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case in Glasgow on 15 May 2019 before Employment Judge M Whitcombe. The judgment records that, by consent, Miss L Docherty was entitled to £218.33 gross for accrued but untaken annual leave. That award reflects the tribunal's disposal of the holiday pay element of the dispute.
The tribunal also awarded £156 as preparation time, calculated at 4 hours at £39 per hour, under rules 75, 76 and 79 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. The reason given was that the respondent's continued defence of the proceedings was unreasonable.
The judgment is brief and does not set out a fuller liability narrative beyond those two disposals. The bottom-line financial outcome recorded in the judgment is £374.33 in total, made up of the annual leave payment and the preparation time award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | By consent, the claimant was entitled to £218.33 gross in respect of accrued but untaken annual leave. | Upheld | — | £218 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £374
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rules 75, 76 and 79 of the ET Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.