Case 4102788/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Aldridge v Represented by: In Person Alan Jackson t/a Venture Glasgow — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102788/2019
- Decision date
- 7 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Aldridge
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Glasgow hearing on 20 December 2019 before Employment Judge F Eccles, the tribunal ordered the second respondent to pay the claimant £1,570.96 in wages, described as £332.20 plus £1,238.76, together with £339.30 holiday pay, £312 notice pay, and £145 work related expenses. Those sums total £2,367.26.
The tribunal also recorded that the second respondent had failed to issue itemised pay statements for September, October and November 2018. The first respondent was dismissed from the proceedings. The extracted judgment does not set out any separate monetary award for the itemised pay statement finding and does not identify any additional legal test or reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment orders 'wages' of £1,570.96, broken down as £332.20 plus £1,238.76. | Upheld | — | £1,571 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £339 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment orders notice pay of £312. | Upheld | — | £312 |
| Other | The judgment orders work related expenses of £145; the legal basis is not identified in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £145 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the second respondent had failed to issue itemised pay statements for September, October and November 2018. No separate monetary award is stated. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,367
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.