Case 4102791/2019 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102791/2019 Preliminary Hearing at Edinburgh on May 2019 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Charlene MacDonald v Represented by Mr T Graham Lay Representative Sky Subscribers Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102791/2019
- Decision date
- 26 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo Macleod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102791/2019 Preliminary Hearing at Edinburgh on May 2019 Employment Judge: M A Macleod Charlene MacDonald
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a single claim of unfair dismissal after her employment with the respondent ended on 9 September 2018. The tribunal found that she started work on 16 February 2018 and therefore had just under seven months' service by the effective date of termination. The respondent argued that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction because she did not meet the two-year qualifying service requirement in section 108(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant wished to pursue the case and that she had also raised arguments about grievance handling and time limits, but it held that those matters did not alter the statutory service requirement. It stated that there was no discretion to hear an unfair dismissal claim where the claimant could not show two years' qualifying service. The tribunal therefore concluded that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim.
Although the parties also addressed whether the claim was presented in time and whether early conciliation extended the limitation period, the tribunal said it was unnecessary to decide that issue because the claim failed in any event for want of qualifying service. The claim was accordingly dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the claimant had less than two years' qualifying service; the tribunal therefore did not reach the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.108(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.207B Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.