Case 4102799/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102799/2015 & others Mr P Smith & others (see attached schedule) v United Wire (a business operated by M-I Drilling Fluids UK Limited) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102799/2015
- Decision date
- 24 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102799/2015 & others Mr P Smith & others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment covers the linked cases listed in the attached schedule against United Wire (a business operated by M-I Drilling Fluids UK Limited). The only disposition recorded is procedural: the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants.
Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment records no substantive findings on liability or remedy, and no monetary award is set out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The claims were withdrawn by the claimants and then dismissed under Rule 52. The judgment text does not describe the substantive issues; the case listing identifies the matter as a Working Time Regulations case. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.