Case 4102805/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102805/2023 Held via Cloud Video Platform (CVP) in Glasgow on October 2023 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Miss Ieva Vaisiauskaite v T.O.P Car Parts Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102805/2023
- Decision date
- 19 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102805/2023 Held via Cloud Video Platform (CVP) in Glasgow on October 2023 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Miss Ieva Vaisiauskaite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss Ieva Vaisiauskaite, worked for T.O.P Car Parts Ltd from 22 November 2022, based at home, for 48 hours per week at £12 per hour. The respondent did not appear at the final hearing. The tribunal found the claimant to be a credible witness and heard her evidence with the assistance of a Lithuanian interpreter.
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction. The claimant had not completed two years' continuous employment by the effective date of termination, and no statutory exception applied. The tribunal also noted that, although the claimant had said in her ET1 that she was dismissed without notice, she became aware around 17 March 2023 that her employment was ending and then continued working until 31 March 2023, so there was no breach of the statutory minimum notice period.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that she had not been paid for work between 17 and 31 March 2023, despite payslips showing net pay of £481.20 per week. It therefore upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and awarded £962.40 net, with the respondent to account to HMRC for the appropriate tax and employee National Insurance.
The tribunal also accepted that the claimant's final payslip showed accrued holiday entitlement of 64.62 hours. Applying the hourly rate of £12, it upheld the holiday pay claim and awarded £775.44 gross. Separately, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of initial employment particulars, and under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 it made an award of four weeks' pay. Using the statutory weekly cap of £571, that award was £2,284.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the claimant had not completed two years' continuous employment by the effective date of termination, and no exception applied. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted that the claimant was not paid for the period 17 to 31 March 2023 despite payslips showing net pay of £481.20 per week. | Upheld | — | £962 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal accepted that the claimant had accrued but untaken holiday of 64.62 hours and awarded holiday pay on termination at £12 per hour. | Upheld | — | £775 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,022
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.108(1) ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
- regs 13 and 13A Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.1(1) ERA
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
- s.227 ERA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.