Case 4102809/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102809/2022 (V) Held via Cloud Video Platform (CVP) in Glasgow on August 2022 Employment Judge N M Hosie Miss J Hunter v Mr A Young –10 Citizens Advice Bureau Mr Topulabavan Jeyaraja — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102809/2022
- Decision date
- 19 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Hosie Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102809/2022 (V) Held via Cloud Video Platform (CVP) in Glasgow on August 2022 Employment Judge N M Hosie Miss J Hunter
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J Hunter worked for the respondent as a Sales Assistant from 6 October 2021 until she resigned on 21 January 2022 to take alternative employment. The respondent did not defend the claim. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant, found her credible and reliable, and accepted her evidence on the length of employment, pay, and the absence of the relevant employment documents and leave payment.
On the annual leave issue, the tribunal found that the claimant worked a five-day week, earned £196 gross per week, and therefore £39.20 per day. On the basis of 15.5 weeks' employment, she accrued 8.3 days' leave on termination. The tribunal held that the claim under Regulation 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well-founded and awarded £325.36 as payment in lieu of annual leave.
On the written particulars issue, the tribunal found that the respondent should have provided a written statement of particulars of employment when the claimant started work and did not do so. Applying s.38 of the Employment Act 2002, it awarded the statutory minimum of two weeks' pay, calculated at £392.
The judgment also recorded that the respondent failed to provide an itemised pay statement. In addition, the claimant said the respondent had later told HMRC that he had paid her £187.11 for a period in 2022 when she said she was not working for him, which had led to a Universal Credit deduction. The tribunal accepted her evidence that she had not worked for the respondent in that period, but said that this was not a matter the Employment Tribunal could consider.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Claim under Regulation 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for payment in lieu of accrued annual leave. | Upheld | — | £325 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment; tribunal awarded the statutory minimum of two weeks' pay under s.38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £392 |
| Other | The judgment recorded that the respondent failed to provide an itemised pay statement, but no separate monetary award was stated. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £717
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Regulation 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.38 of the Employment Act 2002
- Schedule 5 to the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.