Case 4102810/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102810/2022 Mr A Bell v Highland Holiday Home Cleaning and Maintenance — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102810/2022
- Decision date
- 25 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102810/2022 Mr A Bell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The judgment records that Highland Holiday Home Cleaning and Maintenance made an unauthorised deduction from Mr A Bell's wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £628.00 for that unlawful deduction. It also found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £77.00 for that claim.
The listed hearing on 22 September 2022 was cancelled. The judgment does not record any separate award for interest, basic award, compensatory award, or injury to feelings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment on the available material; the respondent presented no response to the claim. | Upheld | — | £628 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £77 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £705
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.