Case 4102841/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102841/2020 Mr J Campbell v Cordia (Services) LLP Glasgow City Council Culture And Sport Glasgow (trading) C.i.c — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102841/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102841/2020 Mr J Campbell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Frances Eccles struck out Mr J Campbell's claim on 22 September 2022 under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 2 September 2022 to provide written reasons by 16 September 2022, or to request a hearing on why strikeout should not be ordered, but he did not provide an acceptable reason or ask for a hearing.
The judgment does not determine the merits of the substantive claim(s). No remedy was awarded because the claim was struck out at the procedural stage.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out for not being actively pursued. The substantive claim type is taken from the case listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' being struck out for not being actively pursued. The substantive claim type is taken from the case listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.