Case 4102848/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102848/2020 Ms Z Boyle v Cordia (Services) LLP Glasgow City Council Culture And Sport Glasgow (trading) C.i.c — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102848/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102848/2020 Ms Z Boyle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 22 September 2022 Employment Judge Frances Eccles struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment records that on 2 September 2022 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 16 September 2022, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal made the strike-out order. The judgment does not record any findings on the merits of the underlying equal pay or working time allegations.
No remedy was awarded and the judgment does not contain any monetary findings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment does not identify this claim separately, but the case listing category included equal pay and the tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify this claim separately, but the case listing category included working time and the tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.