Case 4102854/2019 · Employment Tribunal
16 B(Scot) Rule judgment on liability, remedy to be determined at a hearing EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102854/2019 Mr S McDonald v Avc Immedia — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102854/2019
- Decision date
- 17 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Jane Garvie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 B(Scot) Rule judgment on liability, remedy to be determined at a hearing EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102854/2019 Mr S McDonald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S McDonald brought claims against Avc Immedia in case 4102854/2019. The claim form was sent to the respondent on 14 March 2019, but the respondent did not enter a response within the required time. Employment Judge F Jane Garvie therefore issued a Rule 21 judgment on liability on 16 April 2019, entered in the register on 17 April 2019.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and entitlement to a basic compensatory award, failure to pay wages, and failure to be entitled to be accompanied at a disciplinary meeting all succeeded. The judgment does not contain findings on contested evidence, because the respondent had not presented a response and the matter was determined on the material available under Rule 21.
The tribunal did not quantify the remedy in this judgment. It stated that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled could not be determined without a further hearing, and that a separate hearing would be arranged for remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal and entitlement to a basic compensatory award succeeded. Remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of failure to pay wages succeeded. Remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of failure to be entitled to be accompanied at a disciplinary meeting succeeded. The judgment does not identify a specific statutory label for this complaint. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.