Case 4102857/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4102857/2019 Miss S McLeish v Health Board — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102857/2019
- Decision date
- 29 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4102857/2019 Miss S McLeish
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S McLeish brought a claim against Tayside Health Board, but the judgment records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. Employment Judge Ian McFatridge signed the judgment on 29 November 2019.
The tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment makes no findings on the merits of the underlying allegations and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Underlying claim type inferred from the case listing context; the judgment itself records only that the claim was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Underlying claim type inferred from the case listing context; the judgment itself records only that the claim was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.