Case 4102858/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4102858/2019 Mr P Mitchell v Represented by: Miss L Campbell Solicitor Dundee City Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102858/2019
- Decision date
- 2 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4102858/2019 Mr P Mitchell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records a single complaint of Public Interest Disclosure brought by Mr P Mitchell against Dundee City Council. The respondent was represented by Miss L Campbell, solicitor, and the claimant by Ms M Geddes, solicitor.
The tribunal stated that the Public Interest Disclosure complaint had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the complaint was dismissed under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or evidence are recorded in the extracted judgment beyond the withdrawal and dismissal order. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Ian McFatridge on 2 May 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the Public Interest Disclosure complaint had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.