Case 4102859/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102859/2022 Mr I Stein v Inverclean Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102859/2022
- Decision date
- 22 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102859/2022 Mr I Stein
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented. The Employment Judge decided the case on the available material and cancelled the hearing listed for 1 August 2022.
The tribunal held that Mr I Stein had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered Inverclean Services Limited to pay damages of £4,200, calculated as 12 weeks at £350 per week. The judgment records that this was a net sum, but it had been calculated using gross pay because the tribunal considered there was a likelihood that tax would have to be paid on the sum as post-employment notice pay.
The tribunal also held that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. That payment was assessed at £8,225, using the formula set out in the judgment: 13 years at £350 per week, plus 7 years at £350 per week multiplied by 1.5. No separate award of interest or other remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £4,200, described as 12 weeks at £350 per week. The judgment noted this was a net sum calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that tax would be payable on post-employment notice pay. | Upheld | — | £4,200 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £8,225, calculated as (13 years x £350 per week) plus (7 years x £350 per week x 1.5). | Upheld | — | £8,225 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,425
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.