Case 4102867/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Kirkland v DLSH Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 4102867/2025
- Decision date
- 29 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Kirkland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr N Kirkland had been employed by DLSH Ltd since 3 August 2019 and was manager of the Bonnyrigg store. The tribunal found that he had raised concerns from January 2024 about alleged bullying by Ally and about Dale not carrying out duties to the required standard. It found that in around January or February 2025 he hid 20 bottles of vaping liquid in the premises in order to prompt a stock discrepancy and force a meeting with Mr Henderson. The claimant then told Mr Iwaniec not to keep Ronan and Dave informed until they had spoken, and on 5 April 2025 he was called to an investigatory meeting about "Falsely reporting stock delivery discrepancies to hide till errors."
The tribunal held that the dismissal was unfair within section 98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996 and the Burchell test. It found that Mr Henderson did not have reasonable grounds for the belief that misconduct had occurred, did not carry out as much investigation as was reasonable, and did not have a clear understanding of what allegation was being investigated. The allegation was not properly specified, no till errors were in fact identified, the invitation to the disciplinary hearing did not include the evidence or say dismissal was a possible outcome, and Mr Henderson carried out both the investigation and the disciplinary decision. The tribunal rejected the respondent's argument that the claimant would have been dismissed anyway, and the appeal was not upheld.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's conduct contributed to his dismissal because he knowingly hid stock to force a meeting with Mr Henderson. It found that he was 38 years old at dismissal, had weekly earnings of £540 plus pension contributions of about 3%, and that his later employment with Costco from 10 June 2025 was paid at £12.80 per hour with reduced hours. The tribunal calculated a basic award of £2,700, a compensatory award of £8,222.82 net, and £500 for loss of statutory rights, then reduced the basic and compensatory awards by 50% for contribution. The judgment states a final award of £5,961.41 net, with the prescribed element set at £4,111.42 and the recoupment regulations applying.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the dismissal was unfair, found contributory conduct by the claimant, and reduced the basic and compensatory awards by 50%. The judgment states a final net award of £5,961.41 and a prescribed element of £4,111.42 for 27 April 2025 to 10 June 2025. | Upheld | — | £5,961 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,961
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,350
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,111
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Home Stores Ltd v Burchell 1980 ICR 303
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.