Case 4102868/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Sharp v The Crepe Shack — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102868/2019
- Decision date
- 27 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Sharp
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the merits of the claimant's underlying employment claims at this hearing. Its judgment was that Ben Larg and Margaux Larg t/a The Crepe Shack, 2 Foodie Cottage, Foodieash, Fife KY15 4PS should be added as respondents, because the claim had originally been presented against "The Crepe Shack" and the tribunal was concerned that the business name alone would not properly identify the employer for service and enforcement purposes.
The claimant had submitted a claim for sums said to be due following termination of employment. In discussing the background, the tribunal noted the claimant's spreadsheet showing 19 further hours unpaid at £7.50 per hour, and noted the claimant's calculation that he had not received paid holidays during his employment. The judge recorded that the claimant's figures produced a total of £862.85, made up of £142.50 for unpaid wages and £720.3526875 for holiday pay, but no award was made in this judgment because the case was being redirected against the properly designated respondents and the new respondents were to be given time to respond.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment did not determine a substantive claim; it dealt with amendment of the respondent designation and noted the claimant's calculation of sums said to be due. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.