Case 4102880/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102880/2022 N Mitchell v Johngbaird — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102880/2022
- Decision date
- 10 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102880/2022 N Mitchell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 27 September 2022 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 4 October 2022, or to request a hearing, so that the tribunal could consider why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that the claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within Rule 37(1)(d). The judgment contains no substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim and no award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out 'the claim' under Rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued; it does not set out separate findings for individual heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment strikes out 'the claim' under Rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued; it does not set out separate findings for individual heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.