Case 4102893/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Steven Morton v The City of Edinburgh Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 4102893/2020
- Decision date
- 2 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Shepherd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Steven Morton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked permanent night shifts as a Residential Care Officer at the respondent's residential support unit. He complained that he had not been permitted to take rest breaks or compensatory rest, and that because he worked during unpaid 30 minute breaks he was entitled to be paid for that time. The tribunal found the claims were in time because the complaints were ongoing and were brought within three months of the last date complained of.
The tribunal found that the claimant's activities involved the need for continuity of service in relation to care provided by a residential institution, so Reg 21(c)(i) Working Time Regulations 1998 applied and Reg 12 did not apply. It also found that the respondent had put arrangements in place enabling a 30 minute break from work duties, including breaks before 1am when three staff were on duty and breaks within the unit after 1am, with the possibility of restarting or taking compensatory rest if interrupted by an emergency.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had personal objections to taking breaks in residential childcare and had not sought to exercise the right to a break or compensatory rest. It found that the respondent had not refused to permit rest or compensatory rest, and that the claimant worked through breaks by choice rather than because of a failure by the respondent. Since overtime had not been authorised and the unpaid break was properly designated, the wages paid were not less than the wages properly payable.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Complaint under Reg 30(1)(a) Working Time Regulations 1998 alleging refusal to permit rest breaks under Reg 12(1); dismissed because Reg 21(c)(i) applied and Reg 12 did not apply to the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Complaint alleging refusal to permit an equivalent period of compensatory rest under Reg 24 Working Time Regulations 1998; dismissed because the tribunal found the respondent had arrangements enabling compensatory rest. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 alleging entitlement to pay for 30 minute breaks worked through; dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant chose not to take breaks and overtime had not been authorised. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- Reg 12(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Reg 21(c)(i) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Reg 24 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Reg 30(1)(a) Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.27(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.18A Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- Gallagher rest break
- Hughes v Corps of Commissionaires Management Ltd (No.2)
- Grange v Abellio London Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.