Case 4102899/2019 · Employment Tribunal
16 B(Scot) Rule judgment on liability, remedy to be determined at a hearing EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102899/2019 Mr L A Hamill v Brown and Mason Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102899/2019
- Decision date
- 17 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Jane Garvie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 B(Scot) Rule judgment on liability, remedy to be determined at a hearing EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102899/2019 Mr L A Hamill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal sent a copy of the claim form to the respondent on 14 March 2019. The respondent did not enter a response within the required 28 days, and Employment Judge F Jane Garvie therefore issued a Rule 21 judgment on liability on 16 April 2019, entered in the register on 17 April 2019.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, failure to pay notice pay, failure to pay accrued holiday entitlement, and entitlement to an award for loss of employment rights succeeded. The unfair dismissal complaint is recorded together with entitlement to a basic and compensatory award, but the judgment does not quantify any sums.
The Employment Judge stated that remedy could not properly be determined on the papers and would be decided at a later hearing. This judgment therefore determines liability only, with no monetary award fixed at this stage.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment entered after the respondent failed to lodge a response; the judgment records entitlement to a basic and compensatory award, but no amount was fixed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment uses the wording 'failure to pay notice pay'. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment uses the wording 'failure to pay accrued holiday entitlement'. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to 'an entitlement to an award for loss of employment rights'. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.