Case 4102900/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102900/2023 Mrs C Franco Monmeneu v Mim Import Export Ltd. and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102900/2023
- Decision date
- 25 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sangster Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102900/2023 Mrs C Franco Monmeneu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim form was sent to the respondent on 11 May 2023, but the respondent did not enter a response within the required time. On that basis, the Employment Judge decided that liability could properly be determined on the available material without a hearing under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 and Rule 16 of the 2013 Regulations.
The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded. It ordered MIM Import Export Ltd to pay £3,511.78 in respect of unpaid wages.
The judgment also records that the remaining complaints were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The text provided does not itemise those remaining complaints separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded and ordered payment of £3,511.78 in unpaid wages under the Rule 21 procedure. | Upheld | — | £3,512 |
| Other | The judgment states that the remaining complaints were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant, but it does not itemise those claim heads in the text provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,512
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 16 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.