Case 4102905/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102905/2022 (V) Held at Aberdeen on June 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mrs H Macbeath v No Appearance Grandview House Limited (In Administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102905/2022
- Decision date
- 26 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102905/2022 (V) Held at Aberdeen on June 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mrs H Macbeath
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs H Macbeath brought claims of breach of contract (notice pay) and for a protective award against Grandview House Limited (In Administration). The respondent was not defending the claim, but the tribunal noted that the necessary consent to proceed had been obtained from the Joint Administrator.
The tribunal listed the case for a final hearing by CVP and gave the claimant notice of the hearing date and of the need to provide documents and engage with the tribunal in advance. The tribunal recorded that she did not respond to reminders, did not make contact to prepare for the hearing, and could not be reached on the day of the hearing, when calls went straight to voicemail.
Applying Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure, the Employment Judge was satisfied that the claimant had failed to attend or be represented, had been told the hearing would proceed by CVP, and that there was nothing to suggest she was unable to attend. As there had been no contact for some months and all practicable enquiries had been made, the tribunal dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claimant brought a notice pay claim; the tribunal dismissed the claim after she failed to attend the final hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records a claim for a protective award, which is not separately classified in the locked claim_type taxonomy. It was dismissed with the rest of the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.