Case 4102906/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102906/2019 Mr D MacIntyre v Cowal Golf Club st and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102906/2019
- Decision date
- 31 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102906/2019 Mr D MacIntyre
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented by the second or third respondents, and the first respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim without a hearing on the basis of the papers before the tribunal.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, it held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment and awarded £3,115.20.
The complaints in respect of notice pay and holiday pay were dismissed. The judgment states that those complaints had been lodged out of time and that there was no evidence to show why it was not reasonably practicable to lodge them in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £3,115.20. | Upheld | — | £3,115 |
| Breach of contract | The complaint in respect of notice pay was dismissed because it was lodged out of time and there was no evidence that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The complaint in respect of holiday pay was dismissed because it was lodged out of time and there was no evidence that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,115
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.