Case 4102907/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102907/2019 Mr R Pollock v Scottish Government (Scottish Ministers) st — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102907/2019
- Decision date
- 5 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Porter Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102907/2019 Mr R Pollock
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment is procedural only. It records that Mr R Pollock's claim against the Scottish Government (Scottish Ministers) and Scottish Executive (Scottish Ministers) was withdrawn by the claimant.
On that basis, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The text provided does not include any findings on the merits of the underlying dispute, any liability findings, or any remedy assessment.
The judgment is dated 28 August 2019 and was entered in the register on 5 September 2019. No panel members are listed in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not state the underlying cause of action; the gov.uk listing category is unfair dismissal, but that is not repeated in the judgment text. The claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.