Case 4102912/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Kudojars v Stewart Milne Construction — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102912/2015
- Decision date
- 1 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Kudojars
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 3 November 2020 the Tribunal gave Mr A Kudojars an opportunity to provide written reasons by 17 November 2020, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that the case was not being actively pursued within the meaning of rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why strike-out should not be ordered and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Robert Gall therefore struck out the claim on 1 December 2020. The judgment does not determine the merits of the underlying complaints and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The underlying complaint type is taken from the case listing category provided in the prompt. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The underlying complaint type is taken from the case listing category provided in the prompt. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.