Case 4102918/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ross Munro v Mears Scotland LLP — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102918/2023
- Decision date
- 21 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ross Munro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat via Cloud Video Platform on 18 August 2023 before Employment Judge P O'Donnell. Mr Ross Munro appeared in person and Mears Scotland LLP was represented by counsel. The judgment was given orally at the hearing and records that the claim in full was dismissed under Rule 27.
The extracted judgment text does not set out separate findings on the individual heads of claim, but the case listing identified redundancy, unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, and working time issues. On the wording of the judgment, none of those claims succeeded and no monetary remedy was awarded.
The judgment was dated 21 August 2023 and entered in the register on 22 August 2023. No panel members are listed in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claim in full is dismissed under Rule 27. The extracted text does not break out separate findings by head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim in full is dismissed under Rule 27. The extracted text does not break out separate findings by head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim in full is dismissed under Rule 27. The extracted text does not break out separate findings by head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claim in full is dismissed under Rule 27. The extracted text does not break out separate findings by head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.