Case 4102922/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Cameron v Caremore Aberdeen Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102922/2019
- Decision date
- 26 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Cameron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs L Cameron worked for Caremore Aberdeen Ltd from 1 September 2015 as a van driver delivering frozen foods. After the business changed hands to Kevin Fennell in or about October 2017, she was told on 22 October 2018 not to work the following day, and on 23 October 2018 she was told that the company had closed and that her employment was terminated with immediate effect. She was paid for the hours worked up to 22 October 2018, but not for notice, redundancy, or accrued holiday.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence and earnings figures. It found that her average gross earnings were £15,468.50 per annum, her net earnings were £1,200 per month, and that as at termination she was entitled to three weeks' notice, 22.8 days' untaken annual leave for 2018, and a redundancy payment based on three full years' service while over the age of 41. It awarded £830.76 for notice pay, £1,262.76 for accrued but untaken holiday pay, and £1,338.62 as a redundancy payment.
On limitation, the tribunal held that the redundancy claim was in time because the relevant date was 23 October 2018 and the ET1 was lodged on 12 March 2019, within the six-month period. The notice-pay and holiday-pay claims were prima facie out of time, but the tribunal applied the not reasonably practicable test under section 23(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the equivalent notice-pay and Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998 provisions. It accepted that the claimant had no prior tribunal experience, no realistic access to advice, and had been reassured by Mr Fennell that matters would be sorted out, and held that she acted promptly once ACAS explained the position in early March 2019.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Held timeous under s.164 ERA 1996; awarded 4.5 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,339 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay; tribunal found the claim timeous and awarded payment in lieu of three weeks' notice. | Upheld | — | £831 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Failure to pay holiday pay; tribunal awarded pay for annual leave accrued but untaken. | Upheld | — | £1,263 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,432
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.164 ERA 1996
- s.23(4) ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable test
- Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
- two-stage time bar approach
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.