Case 4102930/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102930/2020 Ms M McCluskey v Cordia (Services) LLP Glasgow City Council Culture And Sport Glasgow (trading) C.i.c — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102930/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102930/2020 Ms M McCluskey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 2 September 2022 the tribunal gave Ms McCluskey an opportunity to provide written reasons by 16 September 2022 or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment identifies the case as 4102930/2020 and records that Employment Judge Frances Eccles issued the decision on 22 September 2022.
The tribunal found that the claimant did not give an acceptable reason why a strike-out should not be made and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. This claim type is taken from the case listing/case context, which identified Equal Pay Act issues; the judgment does not separately identify or distinguish the heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. This claim type is taken from the case listing/case context, which identified Working Time Regulations issues; the judgment does not separately identify or distinguish the heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.