Case 4102979/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102979/2017 Ms L Aird v Represented by: Action Equality Scotland Glasgow City Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4102979/2017
- Decision date
- 30 November 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102979/2017 Ms L Aird
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms L Aird's claim against Glasgow City Council was withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, Employment Judge Frances Eccles dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment date is 30 November 2017, and the entry says it was copied to the parties the same day.
The extracted text contains no findings on liability, no discussion of evidence, and no remedy assessment. It therefore records only the procedural disposal of the case rather than any substantive determination of the underlying dispute.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. The extracted judgment text does not specify the substantive legal basis, but the case listing identifies it as an Equal Pay Act matter. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.