Case 4103000/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr McMaster v T/a Shieldhill Sub Post Office — 2018
- Case reference
- 4103000/2018
- Decision date
- 22 May 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miss
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr McMaster
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to enter a response within the required period. The Employment Judge decided, on the material available, that liability could properly be determined without a hearing.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaints of failure to pay redundancy pay and breach of contract in relation to notice pay. It awarded £1,875 for redundancy pay, calculated by reference to service from February 2003, and £470 for two weeks' unpaid notice. The judgment records those sums as the remedy for the two successful complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal upheld the complaint of failure to pay redundancy pay and awarded £1,875 based on service from February 2003. | Upheld | — | £1,875 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the breach of contract complaint concerning notice pay and awarded £470 for two weeks' unpaid notice. | Upheld | — | £470 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,345
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.