Case 4103003/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Fiona MacDonald v Revolution Business Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4103003/2020
- Decision date
- 3 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Strain
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Fiona MacDonald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by telephone conference call on 21 December 2020 before Employment Judge A Strain. The claimant, Ms Fiona MacDonald, appeared in person. The respondent, Revolution Business Limited, did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the conclusion of the hearing, and the written judgment records the awards made to the claimant.
The judgment awards a redundancy payment of £707.46 and notice pay of £707.46. It also awards £6,028.89 as compensation for unlawful deduction of wages, and £117.91 as compensation for the respondent’s failure to provide a Written Statement of Employment Particulars.
The total sum awarded is £7,561.72. The extracted written record does not set out further detailed reasons beyond the awards themselves and the note that oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £707 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded. | Upheld | — | £707 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Compensation for unlawful deduction of wages awarded. | Upheld | — | £6,029 |
| Other | Compensation for failure to provide a Written Statement of Employment Particulars. | Upheld | — | £118 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,562
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.