Case 4103012/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T McGregor v The Scottish Ministers — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103012/2023
- Decision date
- 3 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Campbell
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T McGregor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed following an incident in the exercise yard at HMP Barlinnie on 31 July 2022 involving Prisoner B. The tribunal found that conduct was the genuine reason for dismissal, and noted that the claimant accepted the respondent had discharged the onus of showing a fair statutory reason.
The tribunal accepted that the respondent genuinely believed the claimant had committed misconduct, had reasonable grounds for that belief, and had carried out a reasonable investigation. It relied on the CCTV evidence, witness accounts, the investigation by an independent internal investigator, and the opinion of an internal training specialist on control and restraint techniques. The tribunal considered that the absence of sound on the CCTV and the tense atmosphere in the yard did not make the respondent's conclusions unreasonable.
The tribunal found that dismissal fell within the band of reasonable responses. It held that the respondent was entitled to conclude that the claimant had used inappropriate techniques, increased risk to himself, colleagues and prisoners, and departed from Rule 91 and the Use of Force Policy. The claim was therefore unsuccessful and dismissed, so no remedy was considered necessary.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.98(1) ERA 1996
- s.98(2) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- British Home Stores v Burchell
- Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Hitt
- band of reasonable responses
- British Leyland UK Ltd v Swift
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.