Case 4103022/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alan McJimpsey v EB (2023) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4103022/2023
- Decision date
- 24 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alan McJimpsey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, EB (2023) Limited, did not attend the hearing. The tribunal recorded that it had received proper notice and that there was no explanation for the failure to attend, so it proceeded in the respondent's absence under rule 47.
On the substantive issue, the tribunal found that the claimant's continuous service began with Earnock Limited, trading as Earnock Builders, on 16 October 2019, and transferred to the respondent company, then called Earnock Builders Hamilton Ltd, under TUPE on or about 1 March 2021. It found that the claimant was dismissed by the respondent by reason of redundancy with effect from 10 March 2023.
The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,457 and ordered the respondent to pay that sum to him. No other remedy or claim type was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant's continuous service began on 16 October 2019, transferred to the respondent under TUPE on or about 1 March 2021, and that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy with effect from 10 March 2023. It held that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,457. | Upheld | — | £2,457 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,457
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.